https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91591 Proceedings concerning alleged manufacture and clearance of excisable fancy yarn were dropped by the original authority for want of documentary evidence, and that view was affirmed in appeal. The appellate order was found inadequate because it did not properly deal with the respondents' written submissions, which could have been relevant to the department's case. As the record was not considered sufficient for final disposal, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration and disposal according to law. en-us Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:49:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91591 Proceedings concerning alleged manufacture and clearance of excisable fancy yarn were dropped by the original authority for want of documentary evidence, and that view was affirmed in appeal. The appellate order was found inadequate because it did not properly deal with the respondents' written submissions, which could have been relevant to the department's case. As the record was not considered sufficient for final disposal, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration and disposal according to law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91591