https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91578 The Tribunal held that the Commissioner exceeded jurisdiction by addressing issues not raised in the original order, and the subsequent appeal was improper due to a prior rejection on limitation grounds. The approval of price-lists after the original order was considered valid. The Tribunal found the second appeal time-barred, emphasizing the importance of the original order date for assessing timeliness. Consequently, the impugned Order-in-Appeal was set aside, allowing the appellant's appeal. The judgment highlighted procedural adherence to timelines and the original order's significance in subsequent actions and appeals. en-us Thu, 13 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:06:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91578 The Tribunal held that the Commissioner exceeded jurisdiction by addressing issues not raised in the original order, and the subsequent appeal was improper due to a prior rejection on limitation grounds. The approval of price-lists after the original order was considered valid. The Tribunal found the second appeal time-barred, emphasizing the importance of the original order date for assessing timeliness. Consequently, the impugned Order-in-Appeal was set aside, allowing the appellant's appeal. The judgment highlighted procedural adherence to timelines and the original order's significance in subsequent actions and appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91578