<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 433 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91567</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decision. It found no evidence of a relationship between the appellant and the other company based on pricing and discount practices. The tribunal emphasized the distinct responsibilities of the parties regarding sales and expenses, concluding that no mutual interest existed between them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:40:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 433 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91567</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decision. It found no evidence of a relationship between the appellant and the other company based on pricing and discount practices. The tribunal emphasized the distinct responsibilities of the parties regarding sales and expenses, concluding that no mutual interest existed between them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>