<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 285 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91561</link>
    <description>Items treated by earlier Tribunal decisions as capital goods were considered eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. The Tribunal examined the disputed materials against its settled view in the assessee&#039;s own case and comparable cases, and found that the items fell within the scope of credit admissibility. On that basis, the items were accepted as qualifying for Modvat credit and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:24:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 285 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91561</link>
      <description>Items treated by earlier Tribunal decisions as capital goods were considered eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. The Tribunal examined the disputed materials against its settled view in the assessee&#039;s own case and comparable cases, and found that the items fell within the scope of credit admissibility. On that basis, the items were accepted as qualifying for Modvat credit and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>