<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 125 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91510</link>
    <description>Blister packing carried out after clearance of cameras from the factory and at another premises was not part of the assessable value because the goods had already been removed without such packing. Since the packing cost was not incurred at the time of clearance, it could not be added to valuation. The question whether the later blister packing amounted to manufacture was not material on the stated facts and did not form the basis of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:55:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 125 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91510</link>
      <description>Blister packing carried out after clearance of cameras from the factory and at another premises was not part of the assessable value because the goods had already been removed without such packing. Since the packing cost was not incurred at the time of clearance, it could not be added to valuation. The question whether the later blister packing amounted to manufacture was not material on the stated facts and did not form the basis of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>