<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 121 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91506</link>
    <description>On remand, the Tribunal&#039;s remit was confined to fixing the redemption fine and no other issue could be reopened. In determining the quantum, it followed the percentage adopted in an earlier order involving identical goods imported at the same time, where the redemption fine had been fixed at about 123% of value. Applying the same approach to the goods in question, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 5,00,000 to Rs. 4,00,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:18:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 121 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91506</link>
      <description>On remand, the Tribunal&#039;s remit was confined to fixing the redemption fine and no other issue could be reopened. In determining the quantum, it followed the percentage adopted in an earlier order involving identical goods imported at the same time, where the redemption fine had been fixed at about 123% of value. Applying the same approach to the goods in question, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 5,00,000 to Rs. 4,00,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>