https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91502 A common appellate order cannot be sustained where the Commissioner (Appeals) fails to decide a material issue arising from one of the orders-in-original. The appellate authority had not examined whether palladium clearances were validly made under the permission granted under Rule 57F(2) of the Central Excise Rules, even though that question formed the major part of the confirmed demand. The omission left the matter inadequately adjudicated, so the order was set aside and the dispute was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh disposal by a speaking order in accordance with law. en-us Sat, 03 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:00:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91502 A common appellate order cannot be sustained where the Commissioner (Appeals) fails to decide a material issue arising from one of the orders-in-original. The appellate authority had not examined whether palladium clearances were validly made under the permission granted under Rule 57F(2) of the Central Excise Rules, even though that question formed the major part of the confirmed demand. The omission left the matter inadequately adjudicated, so the order was set aside and the dispute was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh disposal by a speaking order in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Sat, 03 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91502