<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 110 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91493</link>
    <description>Concessional excise duty under Notification No. 20/79-C.E. was available only for generators of 100V and above. The assessee failed to plead that the diesel generating sets manufactured fell within that category and produced no supporting evidence. In the absence of both pleading and proof, the denial of the exemption could not be said to be defective. The notification benefit was therefore not available on the record presented, and the refusal of exemption was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:19:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 110 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91493</link>
      <description>Concessional excise duty under Notification No. 20/79-C.E. was available only for generators of 100V and above. The assessee failed to plead that the diesel generating sets manufactured fell within that category and produced no supporting evidence. In the absence of both pleading and proof, the denial of the exemption could not be said to be defective. The notification benefit was therefore not available on the record presented, and the refusal of exemption was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>