<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 100 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91483</link>
    <description>A short delay in filing an appeal may be condoned where sufficient cause is shown, and illness of the officer handling the matter was accepted as a valid explanation. The 22-day delay was treated as brief, the hospitalisation explanation was found credible, and the refusal to condone delay was not sustained. The delay was therefore condoned, and the appeal was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for hearing on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:50:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 100 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91483</link>
      <description>A short delay in filing an appeal may be condoned where sufficient cause is shown, and illness of the officer handling the matter was accepted as a valid explanation. The 22-day delay was treated as brief, the hospitalisation explanation was found credible, and the refusal to condone delay was not sustained. The delay was therefore condoned, and the appeal was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for hearing on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>