<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 88 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91471</link>
    <description>An exemption notification granting duty relief to the extent of duty paid on specified inputs used in manufacture did not authorise cash refund of any unutilised balance. The benefit operated as a set-off at the stage of removal of the final products, and in the absence of an express refund mechanism, the remaining duty credit could not be treated as refundable in cash. The cash refund claim was therefore not maintainable, and the matter was decided in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:31:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 88 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91471</link>
      <description>An exemption notification granting duty relief to the extent of duty paid on specified inputs used in manufacture did not authorise cash refund of any unutilised balance. The benefit operated as a set-off at the stage of removal of the final products, and in the absence of an express refund mechanism, the remaining duty credit could not be treated as refundable in cash. The cash refund claim was therefore not maintainable, and the matter was decided in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>