<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 83 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91466</link>
    <description>Soft drink concentrate manufactured by the assessee was held correctly classifiable under Tariff Heading 2107.99. The classification was accepted because the assessee relied on a departmental trade notice and the Tribunal&#039;s earlier order in its own case, both supporting the same heading on the basis of a circular issued under Section 37B of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal followed that prior view and accepted the assessee&#039;s claimed classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:22:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 83 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91466</link>
      <description>Soft drink concentrate manufactured by the assessee was held correctly classifiable under Tariff Heading 2107.99. The classification was accepted because the assessee relied on a departmental trade notice and the Tribunal&#039;s earlier order in its own case, both supporting the same heading on the basis of a circular issued under Section 37B of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal followed that prior view and accepted the assessee&#039;s claimed classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>