<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 82 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91465</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on re-rollable waste and scrap cannot be denied merely because the supplier described the goods as scrap. The relevant test is whether the recipient established that the inputs were received under Rule 57G and were actually used in or in relation to manufacture. Here, the assessee consistently stated that the materials were rolled in its factory for making final products, and the demand was supported by its own statutory records. On that basis, credit remained admissible and the denial was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:22:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 82 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91465</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on re-rollable waste and scrap cannot be denied merely because the supplier described the goods as scrap. The relevant test is whether the recipient established that the inputs were received under Rule 57G and were actually used in or in relation to manufacture. Here, the assessee consistently stated that the materials were rolled in its factory for making final products, and the demand was supported by its own statutory records. On that basis, credit remained admissible and the denial was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>