<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 74 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91457</link>
    <description>Simple fabrication of angles and channels by bending, punching and making holes for use in fixing electricity poles did not amount to manufacture for central excise purposes. The Tribunal held that these processes did not bring into existence a new manufactured product, and therefore the clamps, cross axes, D.P. sets and similar items were not chargeable to excise duty. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:36:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 74 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91457</link>
      <description>Simple fabrication of angles and channels by bending, punching and making holes for use in fixing electricity poles did not amount to manufacture for central excise purposes. The Tribunal held that these processes did not bring into existence a new manufactured product, and therefore the clamps, cross axes, D.P. sets and similar items were not chargeable to excise duty. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>