https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91451 The Tribunal set aside the rejection of refund claims by the Assistant Commissioner, remanding the cases for fresh consideration. The Tribunal found that the appellants had provided sufficient documentation to establish payment of duty on reprocessed goods, which had not been adequately considered by the authorities. The decision to remand was based on the need for a re-examination in light of the evidence presented, ensuring a fair opportunity for the assessees to support their refund claims before a new decision is reached. en-us Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:10:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91451 The Tribunal set aside the rejection of refund claims by the Assistant Commissioner, remanding the cases for fresh consideration. The Tribunal found that the appellants had provided sufficient documentation to establish payment of duty on reprocessed goods, which had not been adequately considered by the authorities. The decision to remand was based on the need for a re-examination in light of the evidence presented, ensuring a fair opportunity for the assessees to support their refund claims before a new decision is reached. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91451