<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91450</link>
    <description>The court upheld the confiscation of a consignment of cellular phones due to under-declaration of goods&#039; value in customs documents. Penalties imposed on the importing company, its Directors, and Mrs. Nirmala Rishi were upheld for their active roles in deliberate fraud, while the penalty on the Clearing Agent was set aside due to lack of evidence of his involvement in the offense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:07:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91450</link>
      <description>The court upheld the confiscation of a consignment of cellular phones due to under-declaration of goods&#039; value in customs documents. Penalties imposed on the importing company, its Directors, and Mrs. Nirmala Rishi were upheld for their active roles in deliberate fraud, while the penalty on the Clearing Agent was set aside due to lack of evidence of his involvement in the offense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>