<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91448</link>
    <description>Profit earned on erection and commissioning work at customers&#039; premises, being post-manufacturing activity separate from the manufacture of telecom systems, was not part of the price of the manufactured goods for duty valuation. The excess of customer receipts over actual installation expenditure represented a distinct profit on commissioning work and could not be included in the assessable value. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:56:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91448</link>
      <description>Profit earned on erection and commissioning work at customers&#039; premises, being post-manufacturing activity separate from the manufacture of telecom systems, was not part of the price of the manufactured goods for duty valuation. The excess of customer receipts over actual installation expenditure represented a distinct profit on commissioning work and could not be included in the assessable value. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>