<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 165 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91424</link>
    <description>Rule 57F(1)(ii) permits removal of inputs for export under bond and treats that removal as if the inputs were manufactured in the factory. Rule 13 allows export without payment of duty, and Rule 57(4) does not restrict utilisation or retention of Modvat credit on such inputs. On that basis, the appellate order allowing retention of credit was found unobjectionable, and the assessee was entitled to retain the Modvat credit on inputs exported under bond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:24:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 165 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91424</link>
      <description>Rule 57F(1)(ii) permits removal of inputs for export under bond and treats that removal as if the inputs were manufactured in the factory. Rule 13 allows export without payment of duty, and Rule 57(4) does not restrict utilisation or retention of Modvat credit on such inputs. On that basis, the appellate order allowing retention of credit was found unobjectionable, and the assessee was entitled to retain the Modvat credit on inputs exported under bond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>