<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 220 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91384</link>
    <description>An adjudication order cannot be sustained where the record does not show that notice of hearing was issued before the order was passed, because denial of an opportunity of hearing vitiates the proceedings. The matter was sent back to the jurisdictional authorities for fresh adjudication after granting a proper hearing, and the party was directed to cooperate and appear on the fixed date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:32:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 220 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91384</link>
      <description>An adjudication order cannot be sustained where the record does not show that notice of hearing was issued before the order was passed, because denial of an opportunity of hearing vitiates the proceedings. The matter was sent back to the jurisdictional authorities for fresh adjudication after granting a proper hearing, and the party was directed to cooperate and appear on the fixed date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>