<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 240 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91369</link>
    <description>Excise duty on goods manufactured and captively consumed was treated as supportable under the excise scheme, even though the assessee argued the item was only an intermediate product used in manufacture and not independently dutiable. The plea for complete waiver of pre-deposit based on pending BIFR proceedings was rejected because it was not supported by evidence. Partial waiver was nevertheless granted, subject to deposit of a specified sum, and recovery of the remaining duty and penalty was stayed on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:52:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 240 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91369</link>
      <description>Excise duty on goods manufactured and captively consumed was treated as supportable under the excise scheme, even though the assessee argued the item was only an intermediate product used in manufacture and not independently dutiable. The plea for complete waiver of pre-deposit based on pending BIFR proceedings was rejected because it was not supported by evidence. Partial waiver was nevertheless granted, subject to deposit of a specified sum, and recovery of the remaining duty and penalty was stayed on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>