https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91357 Pending disposal of the appeals, the Tribunal treated the dispute over duty under Section 3A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as governed by its earlier decision on the same question and granted unconditional stay in one set of matters. For the remaining applicant, where the capacity determination was alleged to be excessive, it directed that collection should not exceed the duty liability attributable under Section 3A(4) until the appeals were decided. The operative effect was interim protection against recovery beyond the disputed liability pending final determination. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:05:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91357 Pending disposal of the appeals, the Tribunal treated the dispute over duty under Section 3A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as governed by its earlier decision on the same question and granted unconditional stay in one set of matters. For the remaining applicant, where the capacity determination was alleged to be excessive, it directed that collection should not exceed the duty liability attributable under Section 3A(4) until the appeals were decided. The operative effect was interim protection against recovery beyond the disputed liability pending final determination. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91357