<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 225 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91353</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because inputs sent for processing suffered shortage or invisible loss during manufacture of intermediate products. The inputs were cleared to processors under the applicable Modvat procedure, and the assessee had disclosed that some material loss would occur in processing. Following an earlier Tribunal ruling on identical facts, the loss was treated as not defeating credit eligibility. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s claim succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:00:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 225 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91353</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because inputs sent for processing suffered shortage or invisible loss during manufacture of intermediate products. The inputs were cleared to processors under the applicable Modvat procedure, and the assessee had disclosed that some material loss would occur in processing. Following an earlier Tribunal ruling on identical facts, the loss was treated as not defeating credit eligibility. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s claim succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>