<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 218 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91346</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicant&#039;s request for modification of the order, clarifying that the grounds presented were not relevant to the order under consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with rules governing CHA license suspension and highlighted distinctions in previous cases. The application was denied as no errors were found in the record, reinforcing the need to adhere to regulations regarding CHA licenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 218 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91346</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicant&#039;s request for modification of the order, clarifying that the grounds presented were not relevant to the order under consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with rules governing CHA license suspension and highlighted distinctions in previous cases. The application was denied as no errors were found in the record, reinforcing the need to adhere to regulations regarding CHA licenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>