<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 182 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91336</link>
    <description>A consistent Custom House practice of clearing similar imports against Exim scripts could not be disregarded to the prejudice of importers without prior notice of any change. The importer was entitled to like treatment for like imports, and departure from the established practice without notice was treated as unfair. Even if the goods were otherwise liable to confiscation, release on caution was considered appropriate in the circumstances, and the confiscation was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:23:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 182 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91336</link>
      <description>A consistent Custom House practice of clearing similar imports against Exim scripts could not be disregarded to the prejudice of importers without prior notice of any change. The importer was entitled to like treatment for like imports, and departure from the established practice without notice was treated as unfair. Even if the goods were otherwise liable to confiscation, release on caution was considered appropriate in the circumstances, and the confiscation was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>