<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 176 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91330</link>
    <description>Cut-off portions of steel strips arising during trimming or narrowing before rolling were treated as off-cuts for tariff purposes, not as waste and scrap. Applying the Supreme Court&#039;s classification principle for cut portions of steel sheets, the Tribunal held that their scrap-like appearance did not change their tariff character. The goods were therefore classifiable under Heading 72.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and not as waste and scrap fit only for remelting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:16:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 176 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91330</link>
      <description>Cut-off portions of steel strips arising during trimming or narrowing before rolling were treated as off-cuts for tariff purposes, not as waste and scrap. Applying the Supreme Court&#039;s classification principle for cut portions of steel sheets, the Tribunal held that their scrap-like appearance did not change their tariff character. The goods were therefore classifiable under Heading 72.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and not as waste and scrap fit only for remelting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>