<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 159 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91313</link>
    <description>Threaded studs were treated as headless bolts, and the presence of a specific tariff entry for bolts and nuts under Chapter Heading 8313.10 prevailed over the broader claim under Chapter Heading 8409.00. The contention that the goods were specially designed for use in engines under Chapter 84.07 and 84.08 was not established, so the goods were classifiable under Chapter Heading 8313.10 and not under Chapter Heading 8409.00.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:35:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 159 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91313</link>
      <description>Threaded studs were treated as headless bolts, and the presence of a specific tariff entry for bolts and nuts under Chapter Heading 8313.10 prevailed over the broader claim under Chapter Heading 8409.00. The contention that the goods were specially designed for use in engines under Chapter 84.07 and 84.08 was not established, so the goods were classifiable under Chapter Heading 8313.10 and not under Chapter Heading 8409.00.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>