https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91281 Repeated departmental notices on whether cutting of marble amounts to manufacture prompted an application for early hearing, and the Bench accepted that the issue was recurring and already covered by several Tribunal and High Court decisions under the erstwhile Central Excise law. The applicants also relied on an aggregate duty demand and a separate penalty appeal, while the Revenue left the matter to the Tribunal in light of earlier tariff rulings. On that basis, the application was found meritorious and the appeal was listed for expedited hearing. en-us Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:38:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91281 Repeated departmental notices on whether cutting of marble amounts to manufacture prompted an application for early hearing, and the Bench accepted that the issue was recurring and already covered by several Tribunal and High Court decisions under the erstwhile Central Excise law. The applicants also relied on an aggregate duty demand and a separate penalty appeal, while the Revenue left the matter to the Tribunal in light of earlier tariff rulings. On that basis, the application was found meritorious and the appeal was listed for expedited hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91281