https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91268 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT upheld the decision that "Rigid Polyurethane Foam" obtained by insitu process does not fall under CET sub-heading 3926.10 as it is not marketable and therefore not excisable. The decision was in line with the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) order, with the Respondents not appearing during the hearing. en-us Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:46:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91268 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT upheld the decision that "Rigid Polyurethane Foam" obtained by insitu process does not fall under CET sub-heading 3926.10 as it is not marketable and therefore not excisable. The decision was in line with the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) order, with the Respondents not appearing during the hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91268