<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 347 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91263</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Collector&#039;s order due to lack of clarity and structure, remitting the matter for a fresh order after hearing the petitioner. Parties were advised to seek relief before the appellate forum if aggrieved by the new order, as per Section 35B of the Central Excise Act. The writ petition was allowed with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 347 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91263</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Collector&#039;s order due to lack of clarity and structure, remitting the matter for a fresh order after hearing the petitioner. Parties were advised to seek relief before the appellate forum if aggrieved by the new order, as per Section 35B of the Central Excise Act. The writ petition was allowed with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>