<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 338 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91254</link>
    <description>Industrial sewing machine heads supplied with standard accessories and attached electric motors were analysed for tariff classification. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on the same issue and treated the electric motors as part of the industrial sewing machines rather than as separately classifiable goods. On that basis, the goods were classified together under Tariff Heading 84.52, and separate classification of the motors was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:18:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 338 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91254</link>
      <description>Industrial sewing machine heads supplied with standard accessories and attached electric motors were analysed for tariff classification. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on the same issue and treated the electric motors as part of the industrial sewing machines rather than as separately classifiable goods. On that basis, the goods were classified together under Tariff Heading 84.52, and separate classification of the motors was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>