<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 331 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91247</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was denied on oxygen and acetylene gas used in welding and maintenance because goods consumed in use were treated as consumables, not capital goods, and the earlier Tribunal view was applied to require reversal. Credit on the remaining items, including refractories, lubricating oils and greases, nickel micro screen, welding electrodes and electronic regulator, was allowed because prior Tribunal rulings supported eligibility, and technical objections as to delayed declaration, original invoice use, product description, manufacturer identification and photocopy treatment were not sufficient to disallow credit on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:46:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 331 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91247</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was denied on oxygen and acetylene gas used in welding and maintenance because goods consumed in use were treated as consumables, not capital goods, and the earlier Tribunal view was applied to require reversal. Credit on the remaining items, including refractories, lubricating oils and greases, nickel micro screen, welding electrodes and electronic regulator, was allowed because prior Tribunal rulings supported eligibility, and technical objections as to delayed declaration, original invoice use, product description, manufacturer identification and photocopy treatment were not sufficient to disallow credit on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>