<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 320 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91236</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was considered in relation to inputs used for final products cleared after filing the Rule 57G declaration, and transitional credit under Rule 57H was considered for inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods lying in the factory on the declaration date. The matter was not decided on merits; the issue was referred to the President for constitution of a Larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:17:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 320 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91236</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was considered in relation to inputs used for final products cleared after filing the Rule 57G declaration, and transitional credit under Rule 57H was considered for inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods lying in the factory on the declaration date. The matter was not decided on merits; the issue was referred to the President for constitution of a Larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>