<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 356 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91230</link>
    <description>In excise valuation under section 4 of the Central Excise Act, a discount given only to selected buyers is deductible only if it is established as a bona fide trade discount and not one driven by extra-commercial considerations. The Tribunal noted that bulk-purchase discounts may be commercially justified, but the evidence did not show the disputed discount to be a normal trade discount. Material produced for the first time before the Tribunal was not examined, and the case concerned the admissibility of the discount itself rather than recomputation of value on sales to related persons. The discount was therefore treated as inadmissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:06:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 356 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91230</link>
      <description>In excise valuation under section 4 of the Central Excise Act, a discount given only to selected buyers is deductible only if it is established as a bona fide trade discount and not one driven by extra-commercial considerations. The Tribunal noted that bulk-purchase discounts may be commercially justified, but the evidence did not show the disputed discount to be a normal trade discount. Material produced for the first time before the Tribunal was not examined, and the case concerned the admissibility of the discount itself rather than recomputation of value on sales to related persons. The discount was therefore treated as inadmissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>