<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 323 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91212</link>
    <description>Duty could not be levied again on pig iron used to manufacture steel ingots where the principal final product had borne duty and only an incidental steel scrap/by-product was cleared under exemption or on nil duty. The note applies the principle that a minor by-product does not alter the duty position of the input already consumed in manufacture, and that the assessee should not be placed at a disadvantage because the process followed the accepted &quot;latter the better&quot; approach with excise concurrence. On that basis, the demand on pig iron was stated to be unsustainable and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:36:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 323 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91212</link>
      <description>Duty could not be levied again on pig iron used to manufacture steel ingots where the principal final product had borne duty and only an incidental steel scrap/by-product was cleared under exemption or on nil duty. The note applies the principle that a minor by-product does not alter the duty position of the input already consumed in manufacture, and that the assessee should not be placed at a disadvantage because the process followed the accepted &quot;latter the better&quot; approach with excise concurrence. On that basis, the demand on pig iron was stated to be unsustainable and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>