<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 319 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91208</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the classification of rubber solution under CET 3506.00, rejecting the appeal to classify it under CET 4005.00. The decision was based on consistency with previous rulings and the Collector&#039;s discretion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:57:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 319 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91208</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the classification of rubber solution under CET 3506.00, rejecting the appeal to classify it under CET 4005.00. The decision was based on consistency with previous rulings and the Collector&#039;s discretion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>