<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 313 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91202</link>
    <description>Interim waiver of pre-deposit may be justified where the assessee raises substantial prima facie objections to penalty demands and the factual basis of liability requires fuller scrutiny. The Tribunal considered that disputes over weight discrepancy in cleared goods, possible moisture loss, and depreciation-linked wrong credit could not be finally decided at the stay stage. It also treated the challenge to the retrospective application of Rule 57U as a strong prima facie issue. On that basis, partial relief was granted through a limited deposit, with recovery of the balance penalty stayed pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 313 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91202</link>
      <description>Interim waiver of pre-deposit may be justified where the assessee raises substantial prima facie objections to penalty demands and the factual basis of liability requires fuller scrutiny. The Tribunal considered that disputes over weight discrepancy in cleared goods, possible moisture loss, and depreciation-linked wrong credit could not be finally decided at the stay stage. It also treated the challenge to the retrospective application of Rule 57U as a strong prima facie issue. On that basis, partial relief was granted through a limited deposit, with recovery of the balance penalty stayed pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>