<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 223 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91179</link>
    <description>An appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellants delayed seeking the required Committee on Disputes clearance and an indefinite adjournment was considered inappropriate given the uncertain time for obtaining administrative approval. The Tribunal relied on the prolonged failure to secure the necessary permission and declined to keep the matter pending, but preserved the appellants&#039; procedural right to seek restoration of the appeal to its original number once the clearance was obtained. The dismissal was without prejudice to a fresh restoration application after the requisite governmental approval was produced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:52:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 223 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91179</link>
      <description>An appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellants delayed seeking the required Committee on Disputes clearance and an indefinite adjournment was considered inappropriate given the uncertain time for obtaining administrative approval. The Tribunal relied on the prolonged failure to secure the necessary permission and declined to keep the matter pending, but preserved the appellants&#039; procedural right to seek restoration of the appeal to its original number once the clearance was obtained. The dismissal was without prejudice to a fresh restoration application after the requisite governmental approval was produced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>