<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91178</link>
    <description>Customs duty exemption under the Import-Export Pass Book Scheme depended on compliance with the notification conditions, not merely on fulfilment of the import entitlement by value. The Tribunal stated that the export obligation had to be met in terms of both quantity and value, and exemption could not be retained for imported silk not shown to have been used for the stipulated export-oriented purpose. It also found the jurisdiction objection untenable because the importer had sought the no objection certificate from Delhi Customs and the exports were routed through that office. The demand on the unutilised imported silk was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:51:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91178</link>
      <description>Customs duty exemption under the Import-Export Pass Book Scheme depended on compliance with the notification conditions, not merely on fulfilment of the import entitlement by value. The Tribunal stated that the export obligation had to be met in terms of both quantity and value, and exemption could not be retained for imported silk not shown to have been used for the stipulated export-oriented purpose. It also found the jurisdiction objection untenable because the importer had sought the no objection certificate from Delhi Customs and the exports were routed through that office. The demand on the unutilised imported silk was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>