<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 217 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91173</link>
    <description>An exemption entry was applied to plastic scrap generated from inputs on which Modvat credit had been taken, on the basis that the duty-paid character of the inputs was not lost by availing credit. The Tribunal also rejected a new appellate contention that the cable scrap was wholly non-dutiable, because that case had not been pleaded or examined below. The reasoning treated the exemption under Notification No. 53/88-C.E. as available where the relevant condition of duty-paid inputs was satisfied, and held that Rule 57F(2) did not defeat that finding. The demand was therefore not sustained and the exemption claim was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 217 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91173</link>
      <description>An exemption entry was applied to plastic scrap generated from inputs on which Modvat credit had been taken, on the basis that the duty-paid character of the inputs was not lost by availing credit. The Tribunal also rejected a new appellate contention that the cable scrap was wholly non-dutiable, because that case had not been pleaded or examined below. The reasoning treated the exemption under Notification No. 53/88-C.E. as available where the relevant condition of duty-paid inputs was satisfied, and held that Rule 57F(2) did not defeat that finding. The demand was therefore not sustained and the exemption claim was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>