<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 335 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91153</link>
    <description>In a stay application concerning SIM cards imported through couriers, CEGAT considered whether the applicant should be required to pre-deposit the penalty despite the duty already having been paid. The dispute centred on prima facie classification: whether SIM cards were classifiable as parts suitable for use with cellular telephones. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner&#039;s classification approach was not acceptable at that stage and observed that a cellular phone cannot function without the SIM card, supporting the view that the card may constitute a part of the phone. On that basis, waiver of penalty deposit was granted and recovery of the penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 335 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91153</link>
      <description>In a stay application concerning SIM cards imported through couriers, CEGAT considered whether the applicant should be required to pre-deposit the penalty despite the duty already having been paid. The dispute centred on prima facie classification: whether SIM cards were classifiable as parts suitable for use with cellular telephones. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner&#039;s classification approach was not acceptable at that stage and observed that a cellular phone cannot function without the SIM card, supporting the view that the card may constitute a part of the phone. On that basis, waiver of penalty deposit was granted and recovery of the penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>