<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 270 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91128</link>
    <description>Declarations describing the goods as air rifles, together with detailed manufacturing disclosures, put the department on notice that parts and final assembly were being carried out. Since the record already contained sufficient material for further enquiry, there was no withholding of facts with intent to evade duty and suppression could not be alleged. The extended period of limitation under Central Excise law was therefore unavailable, and the duty demand was barred by limitation. The absence of a personal penalty also supported the assessee&#039;s bona fides. On that basis, the demand was set aside and the appeal succeeded on limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:30:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 270 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91128</link>
      <description>Declarations describing the goods as air rifles, together with detailed manufacturing disclosures, put the department on notice that parts and final assembly were being carried out. Since the record already contained sufficient material for further enquiry, there was no withholding of facts with intent to evade duty and suppression could not be alleged. The extended period of limitation under Central Excise law was therefore unavailable, and the duty demand was barred by limitation. The absence of a personal penalty also supported the assessee&#039;s bona fides. On that basis, the demand was set aside and the appeal succeeded on limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>