<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 266 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91124</link>
    <description>In a job-work arrangement under Rule 57F(2), duty on floor plates manufactured by the appellant and returned to TELCO was treated as revenue-neutral because TELCO was entitled to Modvat credit on the duty paid, including any differential duty. On that basis, the duty burden would merely circulate as credit without causing real loss to revenue. The document states that this revenue-neutrality justified unconditional stay of recovery and waiver of pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:00:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 266 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91124</link>
      <description>In a job-work arrangement under Rule 57F(2), duty on floor plates manufactured by the appellant and returned to TELCO was treated as revenue-neutral because TELCO was entitled to Modvat credit on the duty paid, including any differential duty. On that basis, the duty burden would merely circulate as credit without causing real loss to revenue. The document states that this revenue-neutrality justified unconditional stay of recovery and waiver of pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>