<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 339 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91107</link>
    <description>Rule 57A allowed Modvat credit on inputs used in relation to a notified final product, and Rule 57D protected credit from reduction merely because part of the inputs emerged in waste, refuse, or a by-product during manufacture. On that reading, Sodium Sulphate was only a by-product arising in the manufacture of Viscose Staple Fibre, and the existence of that by-product did not require apportionment of credit on Caustic Soda Lye. Once Viscose Staple Fibre was within the Modvat scheme, the earlier allocation of credit made when it was not a notified product did not govern the later position. Full credit remained available for the notified final product without re-apportionment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:00:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 339 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91107</link>
      <description>Rule 57A allowed Modvat credit on inputs used in relation to a notified final product, and Rule 57D protected credit from reduction merely because part of the inputs emerged in waste, refuse, or a by-product during manufacture. On that reading, Sodium Sulphate was only a by-product arising in the manufacture of Viscose Staple Fibre, and the existence of that by-product did not require apportionment of credit on Caustic Soda Lye. Once Viscose Staple Fibre was within the Modvat scheme, the earlier allocation of credit made when it was not a notified product did not govern the later position. Full credit remained available for the notified final product without re-apportionment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>