<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 325 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91103</link>
    <description>Modvat credit may be allowed on the strength of the original invoice where the duplicate copy is lost in transit, subject to verification by the jurisdictional authority. The relaxation under Rule 57G(2A), as clarified by the Board, can also apply in appropriate cases involving a manufacturer&#039;s depot receiving goods under Rule 52A and maintaining prescribed Modvat records. Because the scheme is beneficial and intended to grant input duty relief, a technical objection should not defeat credit where loss of the duplicate is supported by evidence. Credit was therefore permissible on proper scrutiny by the Assistant Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:28:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 325 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91103</link>
      <description>Modvat credit may be allowed on the strength of the original invoice where the duplicate copy is lost in transit, subject to verification by the jurisdictional authority. The relaxation under Rule 57G(2A), as clarified by the Board, can also apply in appropriate cases involving a manufacturer&#039;s depot receiving goods under Rule 52A and maintaining prescribed Modvat records. Because the scheme is beneficial and intended to grant input duty relief, a technical objection should not defeat credit where loss of the duplicate is supported by evidence. Credit was therefore permissible on proper scrutiny by the Assistant Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>