<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 321 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91099</link>
    <description>Deemed Modvat credit on aluminium alloy ingots was treated as inadmissible where the supplier had satisfied the conditional exemption under Notification No. 180/88, because the inputs were then properly regarded as non-duty paid. For supplies from another source, credit could not be denied without enquiry into whether the supplier actually met the exemption condition; absent that factual verification, fresh determination was required. The demand was also corrected for double inclusion and confined to the normal six-month limitation period, as the record did not support invocation of the extended period under Rule 57-I.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:21:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 321 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91099</link>
      <description>Deemed Modvat credit on aluminium alloy ingots was treated as inadmissible where the supplier had satisfied the conditional exemption under Notification No. 180/88, because the inputs were then properly regarded as non-duty paid. For supplies from another source, credit could not be denied without enquiry into whether the supplier actually met the exemption condition; absent that factual verification, fresh determination was required. The demand was also corrected for double inclusion and confined to the normal six-month limitation period, as the record did not support invocation of the extended period under Rule 57-I.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>