<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 272 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91060</link>
    <description>Classification of steel pipes with Teflon lining turned on whether the essential character of the goods was imparted by the plastic lining or by the steel pipe body. On the materials presented, the dispute was treated as arguable and did not justify complete dispensation from pre-deposit. Partial relief was therefore granted by reducing the deposit requirement and staying recovery of the balance until compliance with the directed payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:26:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 272 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91060</link>
      <description>Classification of steel pipes with Teflon lining turned on whether the essential character of the goods was imparted by the plastic lining or by the steel pipe body. On the materials presented, the dispute was treated as arguable and did not justify complete dispensation from pre-deposit. Partial relief was therefore granted by reducing the deposit requirement and staying recovery of the balance until compliance with the directed payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>