<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 335 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91058</link>
    <description>Shearing did not make grey fabrics into processed fabrics for Rule 49A purposes, as the governing principle already settled by the Supreme Court treated such fabrics as remaining unprocessed. On that basis, yarn duty on the cellulosic spun yarn was payable at the appropriate rate plus 1.5% of the duty for unprocessed fabrics under Rule 49A(1). The separate question on addition of Dharmada was not examined further because it did not affect the result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:24:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 335 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91058</link>
      <description>Shearing did not make grey fabrics into processed fabrics for Rule 49A purposes, as the governing principle already settled by the Supreme Court treated such fabrics as remaining unprocessed. On that basis, yarn duty on the cellulosic spun yarn was payable at the appropriate rate plus 1.5% of the duty for unprocessed fabrics under Rule 49A(1). The separate question on addition of Dharmada was not examined further because it did not affect the result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>