<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 301 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91047</link>
    <description>The assessable value of excisable goods does not include the cost of secondary packing where wooden boxes or wooden crates are used for packing the cleared goods. Applying the governing precedent, the Tribunal treated such secondary packing as outside assessable value even though the goods were packed in wooden boxes in all cases. The legal effect is that the cost of the wooden boxes or wooden crates is excluded from valuation for excise purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 301 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91047</link>
      <description>The assessable value of excisable goods does not include the cost of secondary packing where wooden boxes or wooden crates are used for packing the cleared goods. Applying the governing precedent, the Tribunal treated such secondary packing as outside assessable value even though the goods were packed in wooden boxes in all cases. The legal effect is that the cost of the wooden boxes or wooden crates is excluded from valuation for excise purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>