https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91030 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no suppression or misstatement of goods in the export process. The discrepancy between goods cleared for export and those actually exported was resolved in favor of the appellant, who provided accurate documentation supporting the export of automobile spare parts. The Tribunal held that the duty demand was time-barred due to the absence of intentional misstatement or suppression, setting aside the order and granting relief to the appellant in accordance with the law. en-us Fri, 28 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:03:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91030 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no suppression or misstatement of goods in the export process. The discrepancy between goods cleared for export and those actually exported was resolved in favor of the appellant, who provided accurate documentation supporting the export of automobile spare parts. The Tribunal held that the duty demand was time-barred due to the absence of intentional misstatement or suppression, setting aside the order and granting relief to the appellant in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91030