<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 139 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91029</link>
    <description>Marketability is an essential attribute of excisable goods, and where goods are removed at a pre-latexing stage for further processing and are not known or recognised in the market in that condition, central excise duty does not arise. The finding that the goods were not marketable as felt at the time of clearance was supported by technical and commercial evidence, and the Revenue produced no material to displace it. The goods were therefore not liable to Central Excise duty, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:01:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 139 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91029</link>
      <description>Marketability is an essential attribute of excisable goods, and where goods are removed at a pre-latexing stage for further processing and are not known or recognised in the market in that condition, central excise duty does not arise. The finding that the goods were not marketable as felt at the time of clearance was supported by technical and commercial evidence, and the Revenue produced no material to displace it. The goods were therefore not liable to Central Excise duty, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>