<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 123 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91013</link>
    <description>Aluminium circles made from waste and scrap of aluminium remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 180/88-C.E. because the notification deemed aluminium and its products to be duty paid unless clearly recognisable as non-duty paid. Scrap used as input was treated as a product of aluminium for this purpose, so the Revenue had to prove that the scrap fell within the exception. On the facts relied on, that burden was not discharged, and the exemption continued to apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:13:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 123 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91013</link>
      <description>Aluminium circles made from waste and scrap of aluminium remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 180/88-C.E. because the notification deemed aluminium and its products to be duty paid unless clearly recognisable as non-duty paid. Scrap used as input was treated as a product of aluminium for this purpose, so the Revenue had to prove that the scrap fell within the exception. On the facts relied on, that burden was not discharged, and the exemption continued to apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>